View Single Post
  #43  
Old 09-28-2007, 11:55 AM
BobboFitos BobboFitos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somerville
Posts: 10,043
Default Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?

[ QUOTE ]

two is meh... i mean why did you decide to bluff the maniac? i think you get called by alot on the river... just make a hand and stack the guy playing 52/50... hes prob not good postflop if hes that bad pf... so hell call you too much.

[/ QUOTE ]
This was heads up, villain was not a maniac. For what it's worth, I have even looser heads up stats, and I dont think I am a maniac. He was just a LAG HU player. Also, contrary to popular myth, the better play TO bluff is a maniac/looser type simply because their absolute hand values tend to be towards the bottom range. Also, drawing postflop conclusions about preflop numbers is really silly.
Reply With Quote