[TheWorstPlayer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think I would c/f usually, c/c against some people. Generally c/c against not so great people or really great people but not the run-of-the-mill winners. I've never played against aba, but assume he is great so i would prob c/c.

[/ QUOTE ]

if we assume (and it's a good assumption, clearly) that he is great then c/r should be far and away better than c/c. and wouldn't c/f be better, still? does a great player just make a transparent bluff like this?

[/ QUOTE ]
I think great players WILL make transparent bluffs like this because you assume they won't. But yes, I think c/f is fine. No, I dont think c/r is good at all, because he won't VB hands like AQ unless he's going to call a c/r on such a draw heavy board which all missed on the turn. I'd like a c/r for value here with a strong hand since it would let him bluff and would also give you a chance for him to call a c/r with a strong ace.