[B Buddy]

As far as Daniel's specific example and general idea that a player should be able to show one card, or show both cards facing an all in bet, I think Daniel makes a good argument:

a. He said the rule was in place in the past and it did not create a lot of problems.

b. Collusion does not seem likely

c. It adds more skill to the game, which should be a good thing.

If it wasn't a problem in the past why was the rule changed, and if it's allowed in high stakes cash games, why won't it work in tournaments?

I would think that most tournament players would agree with Daniel but maybe somebody could put a poll to get a better feel for that or you could talk to more poker players.