[TNixon]

So there's not one single person willing to contribute stats to the cause, in an attempt to figure out if cash is lower variance than husngs of the same buy-in in the real world?

Based on all the evidence so far, I honestly believe that cash is lower variance, despite the fact that general opinion seems to be that the average swings are much bigger in cash.

It's tough to determine whether reality matches theory without any data though.

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Even if the numbers I need aren't easily available in pokertracker, there are some other ways to get at them, though, as long as you have a sufficiently large number of saved hand histories. And if anonymity is the issue, those ways would compile stats that you could send me, without requiring you to send me the actual histories.