[rwperu34]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Give us Dixon, Paysinger, Colvin, Johnson and Bacon back and we will beat a fully healthy USC 7 times out of 10 on a neutral site.


[/ QUOTE ]

This is the homer in you talking. USC is significantly better at 20 of the 22 starting positons on the field. Stewart isn't that far ahead of the guys USC throws out there. Dixon is a huge edge over Booty, but I'd still make USC a 6 point favorite against Oregon on a neutral field. The times Booty plays as well as Dixon, which would be many, Oregon would have no chance.

[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
You really believe this don't you...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...

I guess I'll just say "LOL" and move on, because you aren't worth it. Personally I'd give USC 14/22 positions, with Oregon having 8, but the minor detail that two of Oregon's 8 are people who are the second best player in the COUNTRY at their position and that several of USC's 14 are by very slim margins leaves Oregon as the better overall team.

[/ QUOTE ]

The difference between Oregon and USC? USC can win games when they have injury problems [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
You did not just feed me this softball? I'm not even going to bother posting my comeback, I'll just let you figure it out on your own.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, I did. Come on. Play with me [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

You know what else I like? All this talk all year about Oregon and the national championship and how ASU is overrated, and ASU is one win away from being in a BCS game.