Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Give us Dixon, Paysinger, Colvin, Johnson and Bacon back and we will beat a fully healthy USC 7 times out of 10 on a neutral site.
[/ QUOTE ]
This is the homer in you talking. USC is significantly better at 20 of the 22 starting positons on the field. Stewart isn't that far ahead of the guys USC throws out there. Dixon is a huge edge over Booty, but I'd still make USC a 6 point favorite against Oregon on a neutral field. The times Booty plays as well as Dixon, which would be many, Oregon would have no chance.
[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
You really believe this don't you...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
I guess I'll just say "LOL" and move on, because you aren't worth it. Personally I'd give USC 14/22 positions, with Oregon having 8, but the minor detail that two of Oregon's 8 are people who are the second best player in the COUNTRY at their position and that several of USC's 14 are by very slim margins leaves Oregon as the better overall team.
[/ QUOTE ]
The difference between Oregon and USC? USC can win games when they have injury problems [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] I should send a thank you to Karl Dorrell for this, because ASU is in with a win! The Fiesta Bowl, that is.
Here's an interesting question. If UCLA beats USC and NTU beats ASU, does Karl Dorrell keep his job?
|