Re: WSEX: Official Monthly Thread: August. (#12 of 12.)
[ QUOTE ]
Tell me one site which has a worse software.
If the software wouldn't be that bad, traffic would have been better than Stars or FT.
Who wouldn't have played rakefree with a first class software.
[/ QUOTE ]
Dude, are you high? It's not the software. To explain why, let's go back to 2003 for a second.
2003- Small site Party has [censored] software and 2,000 players. WPT airs and has their host, Mike Sexton, telling all the fish to go to partypoker.com (com ads were allowed then). Site hits 10,000 players in a month and can not handle the traffic.
Multiple crashes daily were the norm (much worse than wsex a year ago), and support was horrible. They still have a horrible support reputation (even though support is now stellar in comparison to their 2003 staff). Despite these issues, the site flourished. Why? The software didn't improve until they had over 50,000 players, yet in 2004, with [censored] software and [censored] support, they had surpassed Stars' numbers.
|