[Todd Terry]

Although the question is poorly phrased, I think it's somewhat clear that he's asking a hypothetical question (If a live high stakes deep stack NLH game were held and everyone played in it, how many of the top 20 players in that game would be internet pros?) not asking for the best 20 players currently playing big live games. While it could be read differently, the OP implies it was asked aloud, which makes it much more likely that Patrik's answer indicated his belief that 0 internet pros would be among the top 20 players playing high stakes full ring, deep stacked live NLH. I don't think this is a "that depends what the meaning of is is" situation.