View Single Post
  #8  
Old 05-01-2007, 12:27 PM
JoeyJoJo Shabadu JoeyJoJo Shabadu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 433
Default Re: \"True M\" vs. Harrington\'s M: Critical Flaws in Harrington\'s M Theory

I think opening with any 2 in any LP in any unraised pot with 3000 in chips with 100-200 blinds is maniacal as stated. This is the point in the tourney where you start stealing more but to assume you need to shove is a bit much. Too much so for me. I've made many a comeback to win when in worse spots using HOH's theory, although I do tend to ignore the 10-20 range.

M is not technicaly correct as you discussed (based on structures) but I find it builds the escalation into it in most structures and is very workable. I usually do start a bit earlier in turbos or speed tourneys than suggested in HOH, so that I agree with.

By the way... mentioning "misguided" theories in others books might not be the best way to get people read. A toned down "review" of others comes acrosss better IMHO.
Reply With Quote