Re: A Critique of Rothbardian Natural Rights (sorta long)
[ QUOTE ]
He can simply walk onto the land that the capitalist claims as his own.
[/ QUOTE ]
They both have this claim so is anarchy supposed to be defined as people endlessly trampling on each other?
How can that represent a non-coercive society by any measure?
[ QUOTE ]
The capitalist is then forced to either accept his claim or violently assert his own dubious moral beliefs to the exclusion of everything else.
[/ QUOTE ]
Let say the capitalist abandons his belief. Now what does the society disolve into?
Does socialism not imply ownership of your body either? Do i have a right to use your body without permission too?
|