View Single Post
  #4  
Old 02-12-2007, 02:09 PM
lowpockets lowpockets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FB, GA
Posts: 774
Default Re: Is a timed rake really that much worse ???

For a 5-6 hour session, or even for two days of play, I doubt the slight extra rake will really make a huge difference. Instead, other factors such as max buy-in, number of tables, average players, etc. would be much more important to gauge the profitability of the games. I am located equal distance from each casino and would definitely choose Foxwoods in your situation, though I haven't played these stakes at either place in a long time.
Reply With Quote