[luckyme]

[ QUOTE ]
You know, I could have pointed this out earlier, but chose instead to give you the benefit of the doubt. But now you've simply said one too many things in this regard.

Do you have anything of actual import to add to this discussion, or are you going to continue to use this thread as a platform for patronizing somone who is honestly trying
to find some real answers to important and legitimate questions?

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't think the fact that
[ QUOTE ]
reasonable, thoughtful, and serious researchers trust the validity of their findings / theories?

[/ QUOTE ]

rather cancels out the lead-in --

[ QUOTE ]
How reliable are these methods? And if they're so unreliable...

[/ QUOTE ]

I trying to come up with a universe where reasonable, thoughtful, and serious researchers base their finding on unreliable methods. One would suppose that if they did then they don't qualify as r t and s. no?

You honestly believe the conditions you've set up in the OP can co-exist? and that the question IS legitimate.
THAT is what I've been pointing out to you.

luckyme