Re: free Nate
Definitely free Nate. He is an excellent poster with a long history both in the forums and the magazine. In the offending thread, he did his best to remain respectful at all times while asking what he (and I) believe to be an important question. The question boiled down to "would it be more profitable for 2+2 to do more rigorous copy editing?" He and Mason clearly disagree and Nate was as respectful as possible, while asking this question. (I'm not sure where I stand on that, but selfishly, it would make the books more readable and improve my game and bottom line). He did not attacks or throw around personal insults. I find his resulting ban to be the ultimate example of a person taking their ball and going home (coincidentally, what Ray Zee accused Nate of in the thread).
|