View Single Post
  #21  
Old 03-01-2006, 07:04 PM
DespotInExile DespotInExile is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 788
Default Re: A couple of quotes by Nate tha\' Great

[ QUOTE ]
if in Hand 2 for example you can get someone to fold a hand like a pair of 7's or T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] even 3-5% of the time, that begins to have a quite significant impact on the equity valuations.

[/ QUOTE ]

I mostly agree with Nate in terms of betting the turn with weak made hands to avoid freecards (even at the risk of being checkraised by a LAG on a draw).

However, I dont think the specific rationale of folding a better hand that Nate quoted here makes sense. If you think you can only fold a better hand some miniscule portion of the time (e.g. 3-5%), given the very small pot size (e.g., 6.5 SBs), your bet on the turn has around 1/10th of a BB in fold equity. This doesnt move the needle at all.

I think Nate's first reason--namely that many villains will have up to 10 clean outs--is the reason to bet the turn on 4th street against all but the most aggressive and tricky opponents.

I cant tell you how many times my steal attempts on 4th street have crashed and burned on the river due to having given the freecard on the turn.
Reply With Quote