[MicroBob]

augie - me too.
I also don't know why I would trust 2+2's lawyers to do an adequate job on this.
Mason isn't an online-gambling expert to my knowledge.
I don't know if his lawyers know much about it nor do I know if they know what types of 'computer experts' would do the best job. I think there are plenty of knowledgeable 'computer experts' who would struggle with something like this if they don't know enough about the whole online-poker thing.

The fact that Mason has known his own lawyers for 20+ years doesn't mean that I should trust them, does it?

Their 3rd party investigation of this might be more objective than the group that AP has doing it. But I'm not sure if objective necessarily means effective in this situation.
I'm not sure it wouldn't though.

Just my initial thoughts on the matter.
I appreciate Mason's efforts here. But AP choosing to not let 2+2 do the investigating almost seems like the least objectionable thing AP has done through this whole mess.

I do think AP could be more professional and actually offer a response to 2+2 though.