Re: A Critique of Rothbardian Natural Rights (sorta long)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He can simply walk onto the land that the capitalist claims as his own.
[/ QUOTE ]
They both have this claim so is anarchy supposed to be defined as people endlessly trampling on each other?
How can that represent a non-coercive society by any measure?
[/ QUOTE ]
Then by non-coercive society you mean a society where coercive acts are impossible? Because there's no such thing. Define how you're interpreting his use of the word "can".
|