[wtfsvi]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do you think that ACists are more enlightented or less enlightened about the negatives of violence that the averge person?

[/ QUOTE ] More.

[ QUOTE ]
Do you think that ACists accept violence more or less than the average person?

[/ QUOTE ] Less.

[/ QUOTE ]

So then what in the hell are you arguing with US about shooing people and using violence for minor infactions against property rights for? We want a non violent world. Appartently you want one too. Why pick a fight with us?

[/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure ACland would be better than the current situation. Once you allow violence to enforce property rights, violence to balance the problems that ensue might be necessary. Not to mention it can be seen as kind of a tradeoff for allowing violence to protect property. The people say "ok, people get to violently defend their personal interests on their property. but in return, they have to pay taxes for the common good".