Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's impossible to be > 20% in the 16s imho
[/ QUOTE ]
Well its clearly not impossible as Im doing it.
[/ QUOTE ]
You haven't even played 500 tournies.
[censored] artard.
[/ QUOTE ]
speaking of retard, this is a very stupid line of thinking. Who the heck is going to continue at a level that theyre beating for over 20% ROI for 2000 SNGs? (or whatever sample size makes you happy, maybe 5000).
If you want to put some money up on my ability to maintain a 20% ROI over a certain number of $16 SNGs im willing to do that.
I love how regulars here turn into old coots when they here about a small sample size. "500?!! Why I remember once back in 1923, spacegravy himself had a losing period much longer than 500, clearly your results are meaningless son."
So do enlighten me, at what point do my results become meaningfull?
[/ QUOTE ]
How's a $500 even money bet that you can't run at >20% ROI in the Stars $16 NLH 9-man SnGs for the first 1000 you play, starting Dec 1st?
|