[kaby]

i wasn't going to post this because i thought it's a pretty standerd hand, but then i read spiveys post in another topic and i thought i'd check up (villain is more weaktight than TAG though)

I think the idea of 'never fold an overpair to a TAG in a reraised pot' is pretty much always good (at least with an image of ~21/18/4 like mine is).

I run 24/20/3.2, villain is 20/13/2 after 800 hands, 26% WTSD. I haven't got a note on him which means he plays exactly like his stats suggest - weaktight.

6 handed 200nl 6max, 210$ eff

MP openlimps
CO calls
SB raises to 11$
I 3bet Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] to 30$ in the BB
limpers fold, SB calls

Flop (65$) is J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

He checks, I check behind.

I don't see what worse hands call a bet. Given preflop he never has AJ IMHO, so a bet would basicly be only to protect vs AK.

Turn (65$)is 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

He bets 40$, I call.

I showed weakness so call here seems standard. I see no value in raising.

River (145$) is 10[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

SB bets 150$, I need to call 140$ to win 285$ and fold.

Ok so 2 less combos of TT. Sweet. But I still don't see him bluffing enough with AK AQ (and both should be discounted bc of preflop call OOP) here.

Thoughts?