Re: Mason... Sir,
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand why you'd dig up a semi-dead thread.
[/ QUOTE ]
Also, I agree with the above statement.
It is clear that Mason has a lot of grief with the PPA board makeup. It is clear that he is unlikely to change his mind.
But, he has allowed the PPA a reasonable opportunity to come on here and post. The previous hubbub seemed to be settled mostly to everyone's satisfaction.
The PPA is who they are, Mason is who he is. Neither is likely to change soon.
I personally don't see the PPA board as being much of an issue. Of course they have an interest in some aspect of legalized online poker. Who else is going to go to any great effort to help us out? Especially, who is going to put out any significant amount of money?
Mason doesn't agree with that idea. Fine, let's agree to disagree and move on.
Tuff
[/ QUOTE ]
Well the PPA hasn't shown any desire to allow further participation in the decision making processes. Suggestions are make in this forum, the PPA's forum, and to PPA officials; perhaps once in ten or less the reasoning for the decision is given, and too often the culture of "an inferiority complex" so infuses the official answer that any communication is lost.
I still have great hope for John and the PPA. I will no matter what, first offer any assistance requested or reasonably foreseen. I will not prostate my self nor silence my opinions on areas of improvement as a "price of admission."
This is no way to run a grassroots organization.
D$D<-- now using Firefox.. F! M$.
|