Re: A Critique of Rothbardian Natural Rights (sorta long)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ACists are not anarchists no matter how much they like to tag the wikipedia pages. There is no legitimacy to a property claim in a truly free society unless it is obtained through cooperation with others.
This isn't because it is socialistic or communistic, but because such authority is rejected under anarchist principles.
[/ QUOTE ]
BS. The cooperation of others is necessary for any society. You think that "true anarchists" reject the necessity of people not killing each other? BS. You're just being contrary for the sake of being contrary here.
[/ QUOTE ]
Not at all. The problem isn't property rights per se, but the view of property rights as a perpetual absolute. Especially when initial claims to raw resources (for example land) should always be debatable in a truly free society, thus you should have a more fluid and cooperative means of stating property right. Only the socialist anarchist models rejects personal property as a whole.
|