View Single Post
  #63  
Old 11-24-2007, 06:53 PM
Zygote Zygote is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,051
Default Re: A Critique of Rothbardian Natural Rights (sorta long)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He can simply walk onto the land that the capitalist claims as his own.

[/ QUOTE ]

They both have this claim so is anarchy supposed to be defined as people endlessly trampling on each other?

How can that represent a non-coercive society by any measure?

[/ QUOTE ]
Then by non-coercive society you mean a society where coercive acts are impossible? Because there's no such thing. Define how you're interpreting his use of the word "can".

[/ QUOTE ]

Coercive acts aren't impossible but they aren't representative of the societal structure. In anarchy, coercive acts may occur, under government they are guaranteed.
Reply With Quote