[mjws00]

I've read your posts, Dave. I said 'sounds like' specifically not 'you are'. SAGE sucks, shove junk early in a match, 'Learn to play RANDOM'. WTF? They play ATC, call flop 60%, so you can't read them is complete and utter BS and counter-productive. We read them all the time that is how we win. I always have a read, I'm sure you do as well. We are not exploiting a 'random hand' we are exploiting a PLAYER.

Any good framework must address both profiling and specific weaknesses. That is not disagreement simply two parts of a complex system.

I haven't discussed how to play or bluff, only how to document and spot trends. That would be how you develop a framework. At somepoint we can apply an analysis for optimal play against, but we don't even have a system or even a list of what we are looking for specifically.

Btw, my intent certainly isn't to attack you. I do happen to disagree with a chunk of what you write, but I believe that is mostly due to the weak medium.

Regards,

Mike