View Single Post
  #10  
Old 11-20-2007, 11:28 PM
stackingboxes stackingboxes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 251
Default Re: Top pair blind vs blind against lagfish

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i like this a lot

i'd kind of prefer a "bad" river since i think his bluff freq is higher but i'm calling basically any river as played

[/ QUOTE ]

like a spade? thats horrible

[/ QUOTE ]

terp is saying that a bad river card should narrow villain's value-shoving range (like he's probably not just shoving AT anymore), so if villain does shove a bad river he's bluffing at a higher frequency, which is true imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

I get the concept of a bad river gives V more chances to bluff. HOWEVER, the way this hand played out. All the hands that are considered bluffs b4 the river will have hit, and now will be v betting. and the hands that were ahead..well..its still vbetting or checking.

this idea would make alot more sense if there was a straight draw on the table and the flush missed and the the straight draw complete.
Reply With Quote