Re: Why would a player be better at MTT than STT?
Don't look at the raw numbers...look at your game!
[ QUOTE ]
400 stts or whatever is close to meaningless and 90 mtts is meaningless
[/ QUOTE ]
Maybe I actually am a winning player and it is only variance!!!?? Yeah Ha!!! At ministacks I was a winner(+600%) over my first 250+ 18sngs and small mtts..... -600% over the next 150.... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
I had 24 consecutiver 18 man SNGs without a single KK or AA(the suprise was I was up 50% over those??) I can't imagine the strange streaks the high volume guys have seen.
|