Thread: Sicko Revisited
View Single Post
  #24  
Old 11-18-2007, 07:29 PM
Ron Burgundy Ron Burgundy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ronpaul2008.com
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: Sicko Revisited

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
1. Medical school costs, # of doctors, doctor pay... it seems to me that if you switch to universal health care, you'll be needing to worry a lot about how doctors are going to pay off med school. I'm not sure how 'efficient' the medical school market is at the moment.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is absolutely no effieciency in this market. The AMA controls how many doctors get licenses, and how many med schools exist. They do this to artificially increase doctors' income and eliminate competition.

[/ QUOTE ]

fail

costs of training med school student > tuition

therefore

not a lot of med schools.

[/ QUOTE ]

fail

[ QUOTE ]
We have to go very far back to the first meeting of what would become the American Medical Association. This meeting was held in New York City in 1846. Twenty-nine allopathic doctors (MDs) attended the meeting. They wanted to establish a monopoly over health care in the United States for those doctors that practiced higher quality medicine, such as themselves. They felt there were too many different kinds of doctors practicing too many questionable forms of medicine. They wanted only doctors that conformed to their brand of medicine to be allowed to practice. They wished to set up their association as a medical elite and obtain a government-enforced monopoly over health care in the United States.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Soon after the medical monopoly was formed it began to push its agenda of destroying all competition. A well organized and funded nationwide purge of all non-MDs was undertaken. Over the course of the first half of the twentieth century this medical monopoly managed to shut down over forty medical schools. Their idea was to keep the number of doctors low in order to keep fees up. After WW II the medical monopoly started rigidly controlling how many of each medical specialty it would allow to be trained. So ophthalmologists, orthopedists, dermatologists, obstetricians, and others began to be in short supply. And of course when supplies are low, fees are high. The medical monopoly also managed to outlaw or marginalize over seventy healthcare professions. Protection of the healthcare consumer was, as always, the rationale for this power grab.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote