[ QUOTE ]
I was being sarcastic. I've attached a link with a definition for you.
Sarcasim
[/ QUOTE ]
So now you are trying to say this quote of yours below was only sarcasm?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, the advantage of "suitedness" is somewhat less quantifiable when you consider the playability of suited cards. 2-card flushes are almost always going to be the best hand, with considerable implied odds from strong non-nut hands. So that 5% difference in pot equity conceals the implied profit: If I had to go heads up against a range like AA-JJ, I would pay twice or three times as much preflop with 87s than I would with 87o, significantly more than the 5% difference when you talk about face-up all in equity.
[/ QUOTE ]
Please, PLEASE, PLLLLLEASE let me know where you play!! I want in that game in a BAD WAY!!
[/ QUOTE ]
I suggest you never go into the sales profession, I am not buying your explanation and doubt many others here will buy it either. Your post miserably fails the irony test provided in your link.
Jimbo