[Rzitup]

[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

Tuff, I admire your enthusiasm, but I have a serious question for you.
Do you think when a FTSE100 company is forced to drop 85% of it's revenue that it might have had every top legal mind at it's disposal looking at legal ways to offer poker in the US?

[/ QUOTE ]


This post has kind of been lost in the shuffle of this whole thread.
Mike, the lawyers there evidently couldn't figure out how to do it but several other sites could. Is that due to the whole situation of party being a publicly traded company as others have speculated or were the lawyers hired by Party just significantly more gun-shy and conservative compared with the PokerStars and FullTilt lawyers who were looking at the very same UIGEA?

[/ QUOTE ]

If tomorrow Mexico made the transportation of alcohol in and out of the country illegal, would Coors still sell beer in Mexico if they were selling something that was illegally brought into the country?
I just thought of that off the top of my head, so it may not be a great analogy, but you get the point.