View Single Post
  #29  
Old 11-16-2007, 08:53 PM
OrrLives OrrLives is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paddling to Sweden
Posts: 286
Default Re: Player really can\'t afford to play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

(4) scott1:
I may go with this idea. He will still be a losing player, but maybe not as bad if we quit at 3 players.

My only concern is that if either GoodP or myself is stuck for the night, we may want to recoup our losses from LAGP.



[/ QUOTE ]

You can't look for ways to reduce this guys losses and at the same time keep it as an option to take all of his money if you need it!

Also maybe you should set a fairly low max buyin limit? Might slow him down a bit if he realises how often he is rebuying.

[/ QUOTE ]


I agree that if I have an understanding with GoodP that we stop at 3-handed, then we will have to stick with this policy regardless of our losses for the night. I'm just saying that it might be hard to follow this rule if one of us is really stuck or just wants to play longer.

We have an unspoken max buy-in limit off $20, which is 40BB. I think that most 2p2ers would think this is low enough already.
Reply With Quote