[stephenNUTS]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But if they are not around for the long term (which is the lifetime of poker, not the player) how can you know if they would be a long term winner. Also, in order to be a long term winner you would need to consider every hand of poker that has ever been played which is in the trillions (probably more but I'm not sure what comes after trillions). What hands a player plays in their lifetime is still only a short term sample and therefore you can't say that someone is a long term winner

[/ QUOTE ]

This could be one of DUMBEST posts I have ever read [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me why that is stupid.

Stephen you were just mad earlier in the thread about unneeded flaming, so why would you then talk [censored] to me. Quit being a hypocrite.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not talking chit to you,nor mad at you.I also am not the only one who has questioned this post....so I will ask you nicely then if you were offended.

I really have know idea what point you are trying to get accross in this post with regard to SS quitting poker?