View Single Post
  #37  
Old 11-15-2007, 06:43 AM
Sh@i'tan Sh@i'tan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,130
Default Re: [Cross-Post from MSNL] Something you guys don\'t do enough

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Note that we don't want to find a range of hands that have this equity on average, we want a list of hands that each have at least this minimum equity.

[/ QUOTE ]

ringmaster, can you explain this point some more please?

[/ QUOTE ]

hes saying, even though the top 50% of hands average equity is 39.426% vs his calling range we shouldnt be shoving all of the top 50% of hands..

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 60.574% 59.00% 01.58% 124653669020 3331258532.00 { 44+, A5s+, KTs+, A7o+, KQo }
Hand 1: 39.426% 37.85% 01.58% 79971853692 3331258532.00 { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o }

reason being is because some of the hands in the top 50% do not themselves have 36.3 equity vs the calling range(i.e. Q7o)

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 69.153% 68.73% 00.42% 2711419596 16759104.00 { 44+, A5s+, KTs+, A7o+, KQo }
Hand 1: 30.847% 30.42% 00.42% 1200210612 16759104.00 { Q7o }
Reply With Quote