Re: AC scenario!!!
[ QUOTE ]
I responded to them, and then (yes, brashly) told you I would not be responding further. That is very different than what I called you out on, which was insult an argument but not bother to explain any of your thoughts.
[/ QUOTE ]
Your "response" contained about 10 question marks/exclamation marks and a claim that my argument was ridiculous. You basically refused to address my example, because it was "operating under the state", without explaining in what way state interference invalidates it. I'd call that "insulting an argument without bothering to explain all your thoughts", personally.
[ QUOTE ]
I am only responding in my own words (rather than 80s quotes) to address the implied hypocrisy attack here.
[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Your 80s quote pledge didn't last long. I think you're taking me too seriously.
|