View Single Post
  #47  
Old 11-14-2007, 11:16 PM
jukofyork jukofyork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Leeds, UK.
Posts: 2,551
Default Re: The rake is unacceptable

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think anyone is anyone saying that less rake wouldn't be great. Of course we would love it if every site cut rake by 30%. Everyone is jumping on OP because of how he stated his opinion. Would he have made this post if he was better than a breakeven player? Probably not.

[/ QUOTE ]
I can sympathise with his point about being a 11% ROI winning player in STTs but being peeved that he had to pay the same as what he won in fees.

If the sites were to half the SNG entry fees like he suggested then perhaps this would again makes SNGs almost as profitable as cash games (for the top players). A quick peek at SharkScope shows that the high level turbo SNGs are not really profitable anymore with only a few having tiny ROIs (post-rake).

Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote