[freecard4all]

BTW. if fact, the rake is 10% - it's not 5%. Because if you put in 10 dollars and the fish 10 dollars then the rake is 1 dollar (what's 10% of your bet). It's even more when there's wider competition (but you get more money for your bet also).


[ QUOTE ]
Why wouldn't he be paying that much? He could be a break even player.

[/ QUOTE ]
then he should play tighter.

[ QUOTE ]
Where is the high cost of providing us a place to play at? Advertising? Security? Customer support? I dont think so.

[/ QUOTE ]
yes yes yes
Don't get me wrong. I would love to play rake-free. But I can (WPEX) and I don't. Why? Because they don't earn enough money to get the fish into the pond there...



[ QUOTE ]
So what profit is TOO BIG?

[/ QUOTE ]
profit that allows competition to gain an advantage.
As 100% of WPEX wasn't enough ... and you cannot rake less than 100% less ... I'm afraid the Stars rake structure is widely accepted. What's more: it's accepted by fish and that's what I really care. As long as I can beat the rake I don't care.


[ QUOTE ]
I will deal with it for now as it seems there is nothing i can do about it if i wanna chase the fishes.

[/ QUOTE ]
QFT