[TNixon]

[ QUOTE ]
why don't you apply it religiously? since it's optimal.

[/ QUOTE ]
It's not optimal. It's non-exploitable. There's a difference. SAGE is only optimal if your opponent is also playing optimally, which practically no opponent on the planet does.

[ QUOTE ]
Don't listen to someone who says you need a 54% win-rate to beat the rake .

[/ QUOTE ]
Yep, incredibly enough, I've been wrong in the past on a number of things. I usually accept simple corrections, though, and am always perfectly willing to admit to occasional bouts of stupidity. Especially when I've already indicated that I'm not really sure.

Like here. I was wrong. Count after the blinds. Which makes a lot of sense, I guess, since it's much easier that way.