View Single Post
  #46  
Old 11-14-2007, 12:41 PM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: Yuck.....Still Undecided

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But the broad Libertarian themes Ron Paul advocates are simply unacceptable to the population at large.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think as people get the chance to actually listen to what Ron Paul has to say, and think it over, his themes increasingly resonate with many people. <font color="red"> Depends on how you define "many". The real issue is whether there will be any snowball effect resulting from his more reasonable ideas. People see through rhetoric like eliminating agencies M-Z and it taints his overall message.</font>

[ QUOTE ]
Americans tend to want change that comes from the middle; in a way a divided government with little difference between Democrats and Republicans suits us just fine.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, that's the way it's been, and will be - until we more fully wake up. People are starting to wake up and realize we can't forever keep on the path we've been on (for one thing, it's the road to eventual genuine economic ruin. lso, I think most Americans are getting the deep down sense that something is very basically wrong economically in America and that bad things are looming; gas prices, high "real" inflation, the mortgage debacle and falling dollar are symptoms most are aware of). <font color="red"> They may "sense" those things, but there is nothing in RPs message that he has any real answers to the problem that differ from any other Republican. </font>

[ QUOTE ]
Ron Paul represents radical change. He has no chance no matter how effective his Internet fund raising campaign becomes.

[/ QUOTE ]

I do agree his chances are considerably less than the frontrunners, but his appeal is also widely based and cuts across all demographic groups. <font color="red">I havent looked at the polls that closely, I tend to doubt that he has much appeal in the 35-54 group. </font>

Let things get a heck of a lot worse over the next 5 or 10 years, and let his message get out more fully, and Americans might actually then be ready for Ron Paul's prescriptions for America. <font color="red">Elect Shrillary and thats a given, the country will be ready for "anything but". </font>


P.S. IMO the Demopublicans are actually ruining America; the economic rot goes very deep. SS is just one symptom, <font color="red"> rofl, youve been spending too much time here apparently </font> and most of our late prosperity is due to borrowing rather than to increased production. <font color="red"> uhhhh, no it isnt. </font> The current system is on path to economic disaster. Couple that with an insane foreign policy in Iraq, which includes the pillar of unquestioned faith that Iraqis will get along with each other just fine if only the U.S. tells them to and stays for an indeterminate amount of time playing peacekeeper, and the spending in Iraq funded by megabucks borrowed from the Chinese - well, the phrase "coming recession" might easily be seen in hindsight as am enormous understatement. <font color="red">I think your crystal ball is cloudy. </font>

All of the mainstream candidates will continue to bankrupt America's future. The young folks where Paul has been speaking in colleges and town halls are taking this terrible mortgaging of America's future especially to heart, because after all it's their future. <font color="red">That varies widely from campus to campus. At my son's school the general opinion is that he's a clown. </font>

As people see and feel what's happening, and worry more (and realistically so), Paul's message will attract increasing attention. <font color="red">So would his running around the Senate floor naked. </font>

Also, Ron Paul's positions on illegal immigration and the Iraq War are very important ; most Americans want out of Iraq <font color="red"> By the primaries that statistic will likely have changed </font> and to vastly restrict illegal immigration. <font color="red">but by admitting that deporting the current illegals RPs positions arent noticeably different from the mainstream Republicans. When you get to some of his specifics (eg no need for a border fence, and that you can solve the immigration problem by cutting back on Welfare, he just isnt credible </font> Those are two major issues of concern for most Americans, and only Paul shares the average American's sentiments on both issues. He's actually on the right side of major mainstream public opinion on these two, while the other candidates are out of sync with the voters on at least one of these two key issues.

Finally, look at how the major candidates evade, flipflop, and typically BS their way through routinely. Hillary recently caught injcreasing flak for some of that. Paul will refresh voters who actually take the time to hear him, because here you have that immense rarity, a truly honest and principled politician who says exactly what he thinks. And he was elected and re-elected in Texas for how many terms?

So, while I agree that his chances are not high, I think his chances are be higher than you think they are, and that he is certainly not an "impossible" horse to win. <font color="red"> Again, even if he won the majority of states, he will not win the nomination. The Republicans will NOT nominate someone who is perceived as unable to beat Hillary. You can take that to the Fed. </font>

Finally, I'll add that far from throwing away one's vote by voting for Ron Paul, I think a vote for any of the mainstream Demopublicans is a thrown away vote, because, as you point out, their differences are relatively minor in the larger scale of things. So if you vote for Rudy or Hillary, you're voting to spend a bundle, keep the Iraq War going, etc. etc. etc. Same for Romney et al, although Obama might get us out of Iraq. He'd still spend fortunes, though. <font color="red"> Wrong, vote for Shrillary and the only thing your assured of getting is higher taxes. </font>

It's time for a real change (IMO) and the main question is how much of America will think so by election time. My guess is rather low (just not as low as yours) but give it 5 or 10 years and we'll see. And who really knows what the Internet, debate exposure, etc. might achieve. <font color="red">If it achieves anything it will be incrementally and wont look anything like Ron Paul. </font>

Thanks for reading.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote