View Single Post
  #35  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:33 PM
DesertCat DesertCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pwned by A-Rod
Posts: 4,236
Default Re: Warren Buffet\'s Stance on Taxes

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
those ntu figures do not include payroll taxes, but i think they DO include capital gains taxes in their definition of "personal income taxes".

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. The link does not give an explanation but the source is IRS which generally implies the numbers are simply total federal income tax (combo of reg rates, CG rates, credits, AMT, etc.) and do not include state taxes, sales taxes, or FICA. In fact, these aren't the best numbers to use for distributional comparisons but are often used b/c they are the most readily available (specifically, it's otherwise very tough to say much about the super-rich).

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I can't just take your word on this. What are the relative sizes of total income tax revenue versus the other items? If income tax dwarfs them (which I would think it does but I have not seen any comparison) then these numbers are fine to reference.

[/ QUOTE ]

Its been said that three quarters of U.S taxpayers pay more in payroll taxes than income tax. And the social security tax rate isn't 7%, its double that because your employer pays a similar amount on your behalf, effectively out of pay you would have recieved if it werent for the tax. U.S. payroll taxes are over 15% up to $90k in income.

Buffett makes a great point about tax fairness that has been frequently misunderstood. Theresa Heinz Kerry pays 14% on total income north of $4m per year. But another rich guy busting his ass to make the same $4m per year in W2 income can easily pay twice the taxes as the trust fund baby Theresa Heinz Kerry. And a secretary making $50k per year can easily pay a similar percentage as the rich guy, or half that rate depending upon deductions. Our tax system has been sold to the highest bidder and they have the most advantageus rates.
Reply With Quote