Re: Stat-reads vs. real reads for multitablers
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think that 50 is a magic number at which your stats suddenly become "more accurate." Is there really a significant difference between 49 and 50 hands?
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, but we have to start to assign labels at some point. The 50 is an arbitrary, but statistically significant boundary. Since we have so many opponents, it's just a filter for villains that have only like 20 hands played. i agree, that there is no difference between 49, 50 or 51. This is why the #hands tag is important. I will take the label/note at 75 hands less serious than a label/note at 750 hands, but just as PT I start doing a quick analysis around 50 hands. The VP$IP converges fairly quickly that will give you an estimate of at least that number. At around 100-200, I start narrowing down the PFR. Around 200-500 the AF. Above that I don't change my label per se, but start noting down common threads of play. I 2-table while playing, so I have no advice for more-tablers.
|