[9cao]

You all seem to be forgetting we know what Jamie's cards were on flop.

I agree he was acting very strong as he didnt talk a lot and raised vs his normal calling PF.

However, I would guess Jamie was playing close to 50% of his hands that session and has a history of being a loose donk that bluffs too much.

The analysis shouldnt be at the huge hand vs gutter in deeptsacked NL level as Jamie's range is huge. A,K,J can all be outs and PA can even have the best hand as-is.

Dont assume that just because it is is live PA knows 100% he has monster. Every other hand Jamie has 2 unders so why does he have QQ+ here automatically.