[zasterguava]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The very concept of anarchy means that free actors can do as they wish, and this includes free trade, mob rule

[/ QUOTE ]

You post at this forum yet have absolutely no idea whatsoever about the philosophy of anarchism? nice! The fact that you havn't expanded on the perception of anarchism as meaning 'chasos and disorder' is a shame- then again the only anarchism spoke of here usually refers to ACism so I guess your not entirely at fault.

[/ QUOTE ]
Um...where did I ever say 'chaos and disorder', or even imply it? I don't think an anarchist society will end in chaos and disorder. Most anarchist societies would end up quite ordered provided they had sufficient intellectual and physical capital. However, I do think it will result in greater trampling of rights, freedoms and happiness than democratic government, and poorer security from internal and external threats.

See my post below to understand where I'm coming from. It's not that difficult to understand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough Phil. But you did say something along the lines of' in anachism "free actors can do as they wish". There is nothing about that in the anarchist philosophy i read; perhaps the distinction between acism and a-sism needs to be made although i should probably get used to the idea that in this forum anarchism is assumed to mean acism.