Re: Pro-Life is Liberterian
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the court simply states that it is unconstitutional for a government to MANDATE what a person can do with their own body. How is this legislating?
[/ QUOTE ]
Because the Constitution was designed to restrict the federal government, not the state governments.
[ QUOTE ]
Remember those who wish to say Roe v Wade is unconstitutional are stating that the constitution gives us NO RIGHT TO PRIVACY!! We are not just talking about abortion here.
I can think of nothing more closely tied to liberty than privacy.
[/ QUOTE ]
Complete BS. Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional, but there is definitely a right to privacy. The reason RvW is unconstitutioanl is because it restricts the states and the Constitution simply doesn't restrict the states in this way. If there had been a federal law banning abortion and the Supreme Court rules that unconstitutional, they would have been correct.
[/ QUOTE ]
First, maybe you should brush up on the 10th amendment. The states have power that is neither prohibited by the constitution or handed to federal.
[/ QUOTE ]
Exactly.
[ QUOTE ]
The court says that right of privacy is being infringed upon by State LAW banning abortion, this is PROHIBITED by the constitution.
[/ QUOTE ]
Please point out the section of the Constitution that prohibits the states from violating rights.
[/ QUOTE ]
I love your question begging, instead of pointing out the obvious, I will ask you to please reread previous post.
|