View Single Post
  #52  
Old 11-07-2007, 04:33 PM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: Absolute Does Not Respond to Two Plus Two’s Fraud Investigation O

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but for now I think it is better to have the weight of the 2+2 company name out there rather than the names of specific people.

[/ QUOTE ]

He made it perfectly clear though that these individuals were not, in any way, representing 2+2. And now all of a sudden 2+2 and these individuals are as one.

[/ QUOTE ]

from a legal perspective, surely you can see why Mason can say whatever he wants using the 2+2 name and Nat can't?

[/ QUOTE ]

k but that doesnt mean mason should be taking any credit whatsoever for discovering the cheating or anything else Nat did. he cant have it both ways
Reply With Quote