Re: Absolute Does Not Respond to Two Plus Two’s Fraud Investigation O
Nat doesn't officially represent 2+2...Nat is the man, but why would Mason let him say he's going to represent 2+2?
I'm assuming this is the part you disagree with:
[ QUOTE ]
Second, Absolute has apparently agreed to allow Bluff Magazine and Pocket Fives to review the findings of the investigation without a similar arrangement for Two Plus Two. This seems strange considering Two Plus Two’s role in uncovering and discussing this situation.
[/ QUOTE ]
How is he not 100% right? Nat et al obviously deserve all of the credit, but they were posting on the 2+2 forum. Couldn't he be using the word "2+2" instead of "the two plus two posters?"
2+2 should be first in line, not Bluff or P5s. Maybe I shouldn't have said "don't post anymore" but seriously, it's not like Mason is trying to take the credit for this.
|