[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
'Anti-choice'???
wtf, who in their right mind is against choices? I'm lost.

[/ QUOTE ]
Seriously?

Anti-choice = Believes abortion should be illegal.

[/ QUOTE ]

Its no more and no less dishonest a tactic than calling yourself "pro-life" and insinuating that the other side is somehow anti-life. I approve.

[/ QUOTE ]

Except the issue is entirely about life and not at all about choice, which should be made perfectly clear by the fact that even the most radical libertarians (the most "pro-choice" people in the world) are split on the issue. See one of my last posts in the recent abortion thread about obfuscating and misdirecting from the truth about abortion with unrelated, pathological analogies or turning it into some sort of bastardized civil liberties issue (like preventing the choice of raping someone would be a civil liberties issue for the rapist), while totally ignoring the legitimate and worthwhile debate that is going on about the value of the unborn.

Also love how you insinuate dishonesty and then approve of it in the same post.


btw vhawk,

Your input is still desired in that other thread.



[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, if I agreed with a single thing in this post then we wouldnt even have an argument, right? For example "the entire issue is about life and not at all about choice" couldnt possibly be more wrong.