Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, what's your view on the credibility of the Mitchell report, as you had previously asked vhawk for his?
[/ QUOTE ]
This was not just for Vhawk, just a general question.
I dont know. Depends on his sources and his methods I guess. If you can track a persons credit card back to a pharmacy that has been implicated in this whole deal I think that is pretty bad.
[/ QUOTE ]
Aren't you really saying it just depends on whether or not it implicates Bonds?
After all, that is the standard by which many of those with preconceptions are going to judge it's credibility.
It's be interesting to see the media windfall of excuses for the players they coddle, though.
Interesting indeed.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why did you read anything about Bonds into that?
I think it could:
1) include Bonds and be credible.
2) include Bonds and not be credible.
3) not include Bonds and be credible.
4) not include Bonds and not be credible.
Like I said, it depends on his sources and methods.
|