[ConstantineX]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The more important question is obvious. Does anyone here doubt that whatever happens, the LA Times will have carefully calculated it to maximize the negative impact on republicans or minimize the impact on democrats?

My only consolation is that their circulation is in freefall.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL, have you ever heard of $$$$? Like any paper would ever DARE risk being scooped on something like this. You guys with your persecution complexes are just adorable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly, I mean from guys who believe in market incentives, pretending that political slants would trump the prestige, sales, and recognition that breaking a major story like this would herald is just weird. Moreover, I think the Clintons are savvy enough not to risk their dynastic ambitions (AGAIN?!) on sex. Remember, whatever you might think of his policies, Bill was a [censored] Rhodes Scholar...