[wtfsvi]

[ QUOTE ]
Well you said "Doesn't matter where I step, as long as it's not on you. "

[/ QUOTE ] That was when we were talking about if he was justified in using violence against me

[ QUOTE ]
So standing right next to him in his house is OK according to you as long as you don't actually touch him.

[/ QUOTE ] No. I don't think it's OK. But a lot of things are not OK with me. Doesn't mean I get to kill people who do them.

[ QUOTE ]
This is consistent with your position that his claiming that house as his property is an axample of he trying to "enforce" his views upon you, and that you don't accept his claim.

[/ QUOTE ] Yes. I don't accept his claim to violently "enforce" his property. And I argue that if you think my position is "wrong/too idealistic/has to be discarded because it would never work in the real world" - for the purpose of morality and moral consistency - you might as well be a full blown statist. ACists don't have the "moral high ground" they think they have.