[gaming_mouse]

[ QUOTE ]
there's no way they can be 100 percent positive

[/ QUOTE ]

I simply don't think this is true. I can think of many forms of evidence that would not leave room for any reasonable doubt. My guess is that FT's decision here took a long time because they were being careful not to make a false accusation.

I do agree that the time frame is still too long, even given that: I'm sure FT could have elevated the priority of the case and used more manpower to complete the investigation more quickly. That is what they should have done.

Nonetheless, I feel pretty comfortable that they are not carelessly stealing 47K from an innocent player, and I also understand completely why they cannot divulge the details of the evidence.