[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
Well the tone of this thread has certainly changed. No more “thieving FTP give sillysal her money back” comments. Perhaps this is a good lesson in allowing investigations to proceed before wading in against an obviously very honest poker site that is determined to weed out cheaters.

There is obviously other damning evidence that we have not seen yet and perhaps never will. Having seen other information it will be interesting to hear from Mike Haven whether he is comfortable with FTP’s decision to confiscate sillysal’s $47K.

I say well played FTP and if new players are looking for a trustworthy site to play and need rakeback you need look no further if you like an honest game.

The only thing I would say at this point is that FTP should post a detailed letter as to what information will or will not be given on a public forum such as this in future. It may stop people asking for information that is never going to be forthcoming. Also, what systems are in place for sillysal to challenge their decision because everybody should have that right.

[/ QUOTE ]

MOst of us were never posting "OMG she's innocent give her money back." It's just that hte process is [censored], regardless of whether she's innocent or guilty. I don't care what kind of evidence FTP has, tehre's no way they can be 100 percent positive, and to accuse someone and freeze their account for 3 weeks without ever telling them what they're accused of, and for the whole process to be final and without any sort of appeal to a third party or regulatory commission, is [censored]. Personally, I think she is probably guilty of botting, and that she probably deserves to lose the 47k. That doesn't change my opinion of how this has been handled by FTP.