[darom03]

[ QUOTE ]
[...]This argument is ridiculous. We don't have any proof because they destroyed it.

He [Seif] was accused of cheating in this manner. In the past month we have learned that not only is this manner of cheating possible, but its usage was covered up until leaked evidence was so damning they finally admitted it.

They realize the current evidence isn't damning, so they are going to be quiet and let people like you try to damage the credibility of the attackers.

Well let me see.

1) Accused cheating
2) Proof of that method of cheating
3) Destroyed evidence
4) Silence

Doesn't sound so crazy to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe not, but even you must admit this is all circumstantial. No where have there been any proof of any Seif cheating or cover-up plot that warrants a witch hunt.

Lack of proof + continuous allegations based solely on circumstance = conspirotard.

This thread only proves that the more people have invested in an issue, the more they want someone to blame - regardless of lack of proof.